Does Congress Know that the 14th Amendment is Unconstitutional?
Yes!! On March 8th, 1957 in a Joint Resolution of the Georgia General Assembly (pages 15641-15646)(PDF):
"The Congress of the United States is hereby memorialized and respectfully urged to declare that the exclusions of the Southern Senators and Representatives from the 39th, 40th and 41st Congresses were malignant acts of arbitrary power and rendered those Congresses invalidly constituted; that the forms of law with which those invalid Congresses attempted to clothe the submission of the 14th and 15th amendments and to cloth the subsequent acts to compel unwilling States to ratify these invalidly proposed amendments, imparted no validity to these acts and amendments; and that the so-called 14th and 15th Amendments to the Constitution of the United States are null and void and of no effect."
Darn tootin' they know! The 1957 Georgia Memorial to Congress declares that the 14th Amendment is null, void and of no effect due to manifest violations of the Constitution of the United States of America, especially Section 4, Article IV of the Constitution by Article V! Most recently, this has been mentioned in the CRS Report for Congress in November of 2008 (page 5, CRS-2, paragraph 1)(PDF):
"...was signed by Secretary of State William H. Seward rather than the President. 6 The sixth executive order, dated July 20, 1868, and concerning the ratification of the Fourteenth amendment to the Constitution, was also signed by Secretary Seward and has the form of a proclamation. The same was true of the seventh executive order, dated July 28, 1868, certifying the ratification of the Fourteenth Amendment and ordering its publication. Indeed, both of these last two instruments appeared in the Statutes at Large as proclamations. 7 Such were the confused beginnings of bringing order out of the chaos surrounding the issuance of presidential directives."
"SUBJECT TO. Liable, subordinate, subservient, inferior, obedient to; governed or affected by; provided that; provided; answerable for. American Mfg. Co. v. Commonwealth, 251 Mass. 329, 146 N.E. 801; Hannibal Trust Co. v. Elzea, 315 Mo. 485, 286 S.W. 371, 377; Allen v. Simmons, 97 W. Va. 318, 125 S.E. 86, 88; Middleton v. Findla, 25 Cal. 76; Manning v. Sams, 143 Ga. 205, 84 S.E. 451; Homan v. Employers Reinsurance Corporation, 345 Mo. 650, 136 S.W.2d 289, 302, 127 A.L.R. 163."
That doesn't sound like "free" to me:
"FREE. Not subject to legal constraint of another. Unconstrained; having power to follow the dictates of his own will. Not subject to the dominion of another. Not compelled to involuntary servitude. Used in this sense as opposed to "slave." Not bound to service for a fixed term of years; in distinction to being bound as an apprentice. Enjoying full civic rights. Available to all citizens alike without charge; .as a free school. Available for public use without charge or toll; .as a free bridge. Not despotic; assuring liberty; defending individual rights against encroachment by any person or class; instituted by a free people; said of governments, institutions, etc. Webster. Certain, and also consistent with an honorable degree in life; as free services, in the feudal law. Confined to the person possessing, instead of being shared with others; as a free fishery. Not engaged in a war as belligerent or ally; neutral; as in the maxim, "Free ships make free goods."
Also, according to the 14th Amendment, Section 4, we are collateral for the United States corporation's debt! In the next section, we'll answer the "how"...
"The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned. But neither the United States nor any state shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or any claim for the loss or emancipation of any slave; but all such debts, obligations and claims shall be held illegal and void."
What is a Birth Certificate and Live Birth Record?
Glad you asked! ;) First let's define the components of these phrases (words):
"BIRTH. The act of being born or wholly brought into separate existence. Wallace v. State, 10 Tex. App. 270."
"CERTIFICATE. A written assurance, or official representation, that some act has or has not been done, or some event occurred, or some legal formality been complied with. Particularly, such written assurance made or issuing from some court, and designed as a notice of things done therein, or as a warrant or authority, to some other court, judge, or officer. People v. Foster, 27 Misc. Rep. 576, 58 N. Y. Supp. 574; U. S. v. Ambrose, 108 U. S. 336, 2 Sup. Ct. 6S2, 27 L. Ed. 746; Ti- conic Bank v. Stackpole, 41 Me. 305. A document in use in the English customhouse. No goods can be exported by certificate, except foreign goods formerly imported, on which the whole or a part of the customs paid on importation is to be drawn back."
"RECORD. A written account of some act, transaction, or instrument, drawn up, under authority of law, by a proper officer, and designed to remain as a memorial or permanent evidence of the matters to which It relates. There are three kinds of records, viz.: (1) judicial, as an attainder; (2) ministerial, on oath, being an office orinquisition found; (3) by way of conveyance, as a deed enrolled. Wharton. In practice. A written memorial of all the acts and proceedings in an action or suit in a court of record. The record is the official and authentic history of the cause, consisting in entries of each successive step in the proceedings, chronicling the various acts of the parties and of the court, couched in the formal language established by usage, terminating with the judgment rendered in the cause, and intended to remain as a per- petual and unimpeachable memorial of the proceedings and judgment. At common law, “record” signifies a roll of parchment upon which the proceedings and transactions of a court are entered or drawn up by its officers, and which is then deposited in its treasury in perpetuam rei memoriam. 3 Steph. Comm. 583 ; 3 Bl. Comm. 24. A court of record is that where the acts and judicial proceedings are enrolled in parchment for a perpetualmemorial and testimony, which rolls are called the “records of the court,” and are of such high and supereminent authority that their truth is not to be called in question. Hahn v. Kelly, .34 Cal. 422, 94 Am. Dec. 742. And see O’Connell v. Hotchkiss, 44 Conn. 53; Murrah v. State, 51 Miss. 656; Bellas v. Mc- Carty, 10 Watts (Pa.) 24; U. S. v. Taylor, 147 U. S. 695, 13 Sup. Ct. 479, 37 L Ed. 335; State v. Godwin, 27 N. C. 403, 44 Am. Dec. 42; Vail v. Iglehart. 69 111. 334; State v. Anders, 64 Kan. 742. 68 Pac. 668: Wilkinson v. Railway Co. (C. C.) 23 Fed. 502; In re Chris- tern, 43 N. Y. Super. Ct. 531. In the practice of appellatetribunals, the word “record” is generally understood to mean the history of the proceedings on the trial of the action below, (with the pleadings, offers, objections to evidence, rulings of the court, exceptions, charge, etc.,) in so far as the same appears in the record furnished to the appellate court in the paper-books or other transcripts. Hence, derivatively, It means the aggregate of the various judicial steps taken on the trial below, in so far as they were taken, presented, or allowed in the formal and proper manner necessary to put them upon the record of the court This is the meaning in such phrases as “no error in the record,” “contents of the record,” “outside the record,” etc."
With those definitions in mind and passed along with Amendment 14 of the Constitution, Article III, Section 2 states:
"The judicial power shall extend to all cases, in law and equity, arising under this Constitution, the laws of the United States, and treaties made, or which shall be made, under their authority;"
So, now you are in equity at law. To attempt to summarize: we are living under a commercial jurisdiction. All of the laws that you hear everyone complaining about until their teeth bleed like taxes, gun control, traffic, etc are all under the umbrella of commercial law. There really isn't another jurisdiction any more. We have ignored and consented to this treason for over 140 years now and most of our "government" is now corporate! It gets even worse, however, because in 1992, the Nazi's son George Bush ("Sr.") signed Executive Order #12803 into law. I'm not going to quote it because I think you should read it. I will summarize by saying that it privatizes the United States and all of it assets and instruments. YOU ARE AN ASSET OF THE UNITED STATES!
How Can This Be?!
(Prerequisites: Federal Reserve Act of 1913 & Emergency Banking Act of 1933 (CRS Report)
America went back to Britain for an extension; and Britain agreed for a term of twenty years, in exchange for an agreement to three big conditions. One, that America creates another national bank, despite Andrew Jackson's valid reasoning for discontinuing such in 1836. The second and third conditions were that Britain's 16th and 17th Amendments were ratified. The national bank was the Federal Reserve Bank, which was completed and fully operational by 1913. Also in 1913 came the 16th Amendment. Since March 9, 1933, the United States has been in a state of declared national emergency." One result of this national emergency was the introduction of the so-called "alphabet agencies" - i.e. the FBI, the CIA, the DEA, etc. - implemented for the purpose of protecting the government from foreign terrorists, which because the entity in control of the laws is Britain - is usually considered the American people. Simple, right? ;)
In the next post I will attempt to prove how your Birth Certificate is a Bond. I will walk you through looking it up in the Stock Market and find out what "Person" is currently trading on the equity of your estate. So, here are the next questions I will attempt to answer. I would also like to encourage you, the reader, to suggest additional questions or topics to write about. This particular group of posts will be an ongoing project for some time, I believe. Please help!
In the next post I will attempt to prove how your Birth Certificate is a Bond. I will walk you through looking it up in the Stock Market and find out what "Person" is currently trading on the equity of your estate. So, here are the next questions I will attempt to answer. I would also like to encourage you, the reader, to suggest additional questions or topics to write about. This particular group of posts will be an ongoing project for some time, I believe. Please help!
