Names and NAMES
What is a name, really? At its simplest, it is an address or a way to address someone and get their attention. Below is the best description I could find in context of names and titles. Just a forewarning (for little ears, lol), there is some swearing in the video; mostly satirical. He adequately and elegantly explains the multiple facets of names and the abstractions of them therein, but goes off on a weird tangent about "gurus" and stuff like that that I obviously disagree with. If you like the way he explains things of this nature, please feel free to buy into his seminars (I believe they are over the phone). You can skip the video if you want, but just understand that when I refer to a name with correct punctuation (ie: Philip Smith), I am referring to myself. When I use the corporate form, I will capitalize each letter (PHILIP SMITH, for example).
I would like to note that it doesn't really matter what name you use or how it is spelled or capitalized, it is simply a way to understand the fact that you are you and a name is simply a way to address you and what capacity you are operating in. For instance, when referring to "The United States of America" we are referring to the Constitutional Republic operating in Common Law organically and originally intended or UNITED STATES referring to the corporate, illegal, Legislative Democracy in the District of Columbia operating in Statutory Jurisdiction.
Do Your Homework!
If you are the observant type, you may have noticed that I have linked many words and phrases to their respective definitions in the Black's Law Dictionary. I would like to recommend that you cross-reference said definitions with the Bouvier's Dictionary as it predates Black's. Another good read to get you ahead of the game is to read about the Maxims of Law, but it is not required as I will make a feeble attempt at summation.
Here's Where It Gets A Bit Crazy
"...every individual, partnership, firm, association, or corporntion, (and any word or words in this act indicating or referring to person or persons shall be taken to mean and include partnerships, firms, associations, or corporations, when not otherwise designated or manifestly incompatible with the intent thereof..."
The meaning of the word was changed to mean and/or include corporations. This was further blasphemed by making people subjects to the jurisdiction of the newly created corporate government. The 14th Amendment to the UNITED STATES Constitution in 1868:
"All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof..."
In Bouvier's Law Dictionary, there are many definitions for "UNITED STATES", but one sticks out specifically:
"5. The United States of America are a corporation endowed with the capacity to sue and be sued, to convey and receive property. 1 Marsh. Dec. 177, 181. But it is proper to observe that no suit can be brought against the United States without authority of law."
Better yet, we can use the United States Code or USC to define the corporation:
"(15) “United States” means—
(A) a Federal corporation;
(B) an agency, department, commission, board, or other entity of the United States
(C) an instrumentality of the United States."
I will reiterate, you are a corporation (in this definition, "entity") owned by another corporation (DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Inc. (dba. UNITED STATES)).
Can A Corporation That Owns Other Corporations Tell It What To Do?
In short, yes. If you look at Federal (Commercial/Statutory/Corporate) Code of Regulations, Title 27, Part 1, Section 72.1:
" 72.1Procedures relating to personal property and carriers.Regulations in this part shall relate to personal property and carriers seized by alcohol, tobacco and firearms officers as subject to forfeiture as being involved, used, or intended to be used, as the case may be, in any violation of Federal laws."
Summarizing the several sections of the amendment in order, the first is that of the most general application, and which has mainly engaged the attention of the courts. It creates or at least recognizes for the first time a citizenship of the United States, as distinct from that of the states; forbids the making or enforcement by any state of any law abridging the privileges and immunities of citizens of the United States (see PRIVILEGES AND IMMUNITIES) ; and secures all "persons" against any state action which is either deprivation of life, liberty, or, property without due process of law or denial of the equal protection of the laws. (SEE: Article 4, Section 2 of the Constitution):
"The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States."
In other words, all laws are subject to all citizens (or persons/legal fictions) of the United States. The next question should automatically present itself.
How Is This Legal?
That's just it: it isn't. Article 6 of the Constitution specifically states:
"This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any state to the Contrary notwithstanding."
And, the 14th Amendment (never being properly ratified, by the way) creates a new form of government, different form of citizenship, and different jurisdiction. That is why the 10th Amendment does not apply to a 14th Amendment citizenship (the "new" definition of citizen, that is). Here is the 10th Amendment for your convenience:
"The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."
For brevity's sake, I am going to continue on to the following questions in my next post. Sorry for the ranting, but it needs to be explained in depth.
- Does Congress know that the 14th Amendment is unconstitutional?
- What is the Birth Certificate?
- What is it to be Sovereign?
