UNITED STATES, INC. (Part IV)

Parens Patriae

Parens Patriae is of Latin origin meaning "Parent of country". The term for the doctrine that the government is the ultimate guardian of all people under a disability, especially children, whose care is only "entrusted" (given custody) to their parents. Under this doctrine, in a divorce action or a guardianship application the court retains jurisdiction until the child is 18 years old, and a judge may change custody, child support or other rulings affecting the child's well-being, no matter what the parents may have agreed or the court previously decided. In other words, the government has ultimate say in your child's life; not you. Sounds a bit silly, doesn't it?

In 1921, the federal Sheppard-Towner Maternity Act created the birth "registration" or what we now know as the "birth certificate." It was known as the "Maternity Act" and was sold to the American people as a law that would reduce maternal and infant mortality, protect the health of mothers and infants, and for "other purposes." The Act was held unconstitutional by the Supreme Court in 1922 but the Act continued to be in force until 1929. Attempts were made to receive further support, but that was unsuccessful until the New Deal. In addition to its role in the history of child welfare , the Sheppard-Towner Act has a significant place in the history of federalism and the expanded role of the federal government. The act for the first time said it was appropriate for the federal government to respond directly to the needs of women and children. This was and has remained a contested issue. Why would a corporation worry about more than their own bottom line? They don't. Again, we are their assets, remember? They are protecting their own property [us].

The New Deal

Most historians believe that there were actually two New Deals a "First New Deal" (1933–34) and a "Second New Deal" (1935–38). These deals were today's equivalent of the bailouts of Barack Obama's administration a few years ago, but with some interesting legislation bundled with it. I have yet to look too deeply into the more recent treasonous bailouts and any/all legislation involved, but will in the near future (put a fire under my butt to do it and I'll probably do it, lol). Just remember that both "Deals" were because of financial woes and under the premise of job creation; neither of which provided much (if any) success. What do you expect? Socialism, plain and simply, does not work. Recovery finally arrived in Roosevelt's third term, when the demands of mobilization for World War II restored the country to full employment. Ironically, Adolf Hitler probably did more to end the Great Depression in America than Franklin Roosevelt did -- war is money and power.

The New Deal was a devastatingly large paradigm shift in roles for the United States' Federal government. It was a leap into [by definition] socialism. Coincidentally, the Social Security Act was a major contributor to the leap. We all know what Socialism is, but what is a Security?

"SECURITY

Protection ; assurance; Indemnification. The term is usually applied to an obligation, pledge,mortgage, deposit, lien, etc., given by a debtor in order to make sure the payment or performance of his debt, by furnishing the creditor with a resource to be used in case of failure in the principal obligation. The name is also sometimes given to one who becomes surety or guarantor for another. See First Nat. Bank v. Hollinsworth, 78 Iowa, 575, 43 N. W. 536, 6 L. B. A. 92; Storm v. Waddell. 2 Sandf. Ch. (N. Y.) 507; Goggins v. Jones, 115 Ga. 596, 41 S. E. 995; Jennings v. Davis, 31 Conn. 139; Mace v. Buchanan (Tenn. Ch.) 52 S. W. 507."

You can more accurately refer to Social Security as Social Insurance. To explain in very simple terms, Social Insurance is borrowed from the value of your Bond (Birth Certificate). This was further pulling your into the government consideration/asset role as a working servant (or, employee/agent) of the government. It's definitely starting to look more like corporate law now, isn't it? I would like you to remember, however, that you are not a Bond or Certificate. You are a creation of God. In the next post, we will separate the Bond and the Man[kind] when we delve into the types of law and what roles we play in them with Implied Consent (under the Presumption of Law); not yet though.

Prove My Birth Certificate is a Bond!

Admittedly, this took a ton of research to acquire this information. It is absolutely buried in false and misleading information. I can blame the uninformed as well as the informed for this tragedy, but nonetheless, the information is out there if you dig deep enough and keep your opinion to yourself while you do. Remember the Latin phrase "Parens Patriae"? Well, before 1921 the records of births and names of children were entered into family Bibles. The same applied to the records of marriages and deaths. Families and "law" recognized these as "official" records. And, they were just that: Records (a written account of an act).

Since 1921 the American people have registered the births and names of their children with the government of the state in which they are born, even though there is no federal law requiring it. The state tells you that registering your child's birth through the birth certificate serves as proof that he/she was born in the United States , thereby making him/her a United States Citizen. Recall that in 1933 with the government in bankruptcy and a New Deal authorizing Social Security, a social security number became a mandate by the federal government to be issued at birth. The governors of the [then] 48 States pledged the "full faith and credit" of their states, including the citizenry, as collateral for loans of credit from the Federal Reserve system. To wit: "Full faith and credit" clause of the Constitution of the United States Article 4, Section 1, requires that foreign judgment be given such faith and credit as it had by law or usage of state of its origin. Foreign statutes are to have force and effect to which they are entitled in the home state. And that a judgment or record shall have the same faith, credit, conclusive effect, and obligatory force in other states as it has by law or usage in the state from whence taken. An interesting legal definition is that of the word "State":

"One of the component commonwealths or states of the United States of America. The people of a state, in their collective capacity, considered as the party wronged by a criminal deed; the public; as in the title of a cause."

More on titles and capacity in the next post (extremely important terms to remember). Let's recap a bit: the state claims an interest in every child within its jurisdiction. The state will, if it deems it necessary, nullify your parental rights and appoint a guardian (or, trustee (another important word) over your children (ever hear of Child Protective Services?). The subject of every birth certificate is a child. The child is a valuable asset, which if properly trained, can contribute valuable assets provided by its labor for many years. Why do you think they teach teachers to not only teach their students, but their parents that their child needs a good education so that they can grow up and get a good job? Again, you are you, but you are also an asset of a trust (similar to a corporation) and you have a bond as a receipt. As equitable consideration, you reap the "benefits" and "privileges" given to you by your trusts executive/president.

This may all seem fairly foreign to you still yet, but the next post of this series will clear up a lot of this information. I am working hard to keep fact-checking and cross-referencing my assertions, but constructive criticism is greatly appreciated! In the next post I will try to cover the following topics:

If my Birth Certificate is really a Bond, how much is it worth?
What is law and what types of law are there?
What is a Trust?
What is a Legal Fiction?
What is a Strawman?
What does it mean to be Sovereign?

Pretty Edible