Forward
Since September 11th, 2001 I have been changed into a bit of a skeptic. The uphill battle of breaking down the wool intricately woven over my eyes since birth proved a challenging endeavor. What I mean is I felt something was amiss regarding the official presumptions of the mass media's portrayal of significant historical events as they seemed to be either incomplete or completely flawed. 9/11 will remain a mystery for those who refuse to accept either side of the conspiracy. I use the word "conspiracy" intentionally. The word, as defined by numerous dictionaries, essentially means an evil, unlawful, treacherous, or surreptitious plan formulated in secret by two or more persons; plot (ref.). So, any reference to the events of the attacks revolves around a conspiracy; the official and unofficial accounts without significant physical evidence are both, in fact, conspiracy theories. The goal of this series of posts is to open your eyes to the facade of legitimate governance this country can no longer see because we neglect to remember our own history.
Regardless of your stance on terrorists and conspiracy, you have to agree that the world changed in late 2001. But, is that really the most significant turning point, at least in American history? Let's go back for a moment and get a bird's eye view of another significant (but, subtle) event in our nations' history (apostrophe after "nations" intentional).
Republic or Democracy?
This has been a hot topic for over 100 years. Why? Why do Democrats and Republicans constantly and consistently bicker and argue? One argument that has been convoluted by micro-managed differences is the all-encompassing question as to the governmental state of our country. So, what are we? First of all, let's define the two. To avoid arguments over what dictionary best suits who, I will be using Bouvier's Legal Dictionary 1856 edition and for brevity, Black's Law Dictionary (when necessary).
Wait. What is a Representative Democracy?
Not to be confused with a Direct Democracy, by the way.
So, who sets the policies in a Representative Democracy? The elected "body" creates policies/laws. But, this still does not answer the original inquiry. To answer the question, we must step back to the year 1871, more precisely, February 21st. The Forty-First Congress is in session soon after the Civil War. This Congress passed an Act titled "An Act to Provide A Government for the District of Columbia", more commonly referred to as the "Act of 1871" (Acts of Congress, Section 34, Session III, Chapters 61 & 62). What this act created was a separate government for the Distric of Columbia (a ten square mile land parcel in America's Northeast quadrant).
The Act of 1871 was passed at a vulnerable time in America. Our nation was essentially bankrupt — weakened and financially depleted in the aftermath of the Civil War. It was a strategic maneuver by European interests (the international bankers) who were intent upon gaining a stranglehold on the neck (and the coffers) of America. Does this sound at all familiar? Remember Egypt, Libya, Syria, and the "spreading of Democracy"? Believe me, Democracy spreading is more accurately akin to spreading herpes. The Congress realized our country was in dire financial straits, so they cut a deal with the international bankers — (in those days, the Rothschilds of London). Essentially, Congress indebted themselves to said bankers by creating a government in their name and with their [Statutory] laws. Yes, this is treason.
In essence, this Act formed the corporation known as THE UNITED STATES. Note the capitalization, because it is important. This corporation, owned by foreign interests, moved right in and shoved the original "organic" version of the Constitution into a dusty corner. With the "Act of 1871," our Constitution was defaced in the sense that the title was block-capitalized and the word "for" was changed to the word "of" in the title. The original Constitution drafted by the Founding Fathers, was written in this manner: "The Constitution for the united states of America". The altered version reads: "THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA". It is the corporate constitution. It is NOT the same document you might think it is. The corporate constitution operates in an economic capacity and has been used to fool the People into thinking it is the same parchment that governs the Republic. It absolutely is not.
The question regarding the type of government should now be clear. We are both a Legislative Democracy and Constitutional Republic simultaneously. Essentially, what we want and expect our nation to be is a Republic, but the Federal Government (the Legislative Democracy) has stripped away our sovereignty and basic Human Rights to enable a subtle takeover by foreign banking institutions. This now presents more questions. One of which may be "why?" and another "how?", but the next questions that I will attempt to answer in Part II will be the following (probably,):
Let these questions marinate in your head for a moment; deeply consider the meaning of each (for an exercise of sorts, heh). Stay tuned for Part II, if you're still awake at this point.
Next>
REPUBLICAN GOVERNMENT:
1. A government in the republican form; a government of the people; it is usually put in opposition to a monarchical or aristocratic government. 2. The fourth section of the fourth article of the constitution, directs that "the United States shall guaranty to every state in the Union a republican form of government." The form of government is to be guarantied, which supposes a form already established, and this is the republican form of government the United States have undertaken to protect. See Story, Const. §1807.
DEMOCRACY [government]:
That form of government in which the sovereign power is exercised by the people in a body, as was the practice in some of the states of Ancient Greece; the term representative democracy has been given to a republican government like that of the United States.
Wait. What is a Representative Democracy?
REPRESENTATIVE DEMOCRACY: A form of government where the powers of the sovereignty are delegated to a body of men, elected from time to time, who exercise them for the benefit of the whole nation. 1 Bouv. Inst. n. 31.
Not to be confused with a Direct Democracy, by the way.
What Happened in 1871?
So, who sets the policies in a Representative Democracy? The elected "body" creates policies/laws. But, this still does not answer the original inquiry. To answer the question, we must step back to the year 1871, more precisely, February 21st. The Forty-First Congress is in session soon after the Civil War. This Congress passed an Act titled "An Act to Provide A Government for the District of Columbia", more commonly referred to as the "Act of 1871" (Acts of Congress, Section 34, Session III, Chapters 61 & 62). What this act created was a separate government for the Distric of Columbia (a ten square mile land parcel in America's Northeast quadrant).The Act of 1871 was passed at a vulnerable time in America. Our nation was essentially bankrupt — weakened and financially depleted in the aftermath of the Civil War. It was a strategic maneuver by European interests (the international bankers) who were intent upon gaining a stranglehold on the neck (and the coffers) of America. Does this sound at all familiar? Remember Egypt, Libya, Syria, and the "spreading of Democracy"? Believe me, Democracy spreading is more accurately akin to spreading herpes. The Congress realized our country was in dire financial straits, so they cut a deal with the international bankers — (in those days, the Rothschilds of London). Essentially, Congress indebted themselves to said bankers by creating a government in their name and with their [Statutory] laws. Yes, this is treason.
In essence, this Act formed the corporation known as THE UNITED STATES. Note the capitalization, because it is important. This corporation, owned by foreign interests, moved right in and shoved the original "organic" version of the Constitution into a dusty corner. With the "Act of 1871," our Constitution was defaced in the sense that the title was block-capitalized and the word "for" was changed to the word "of" in the title. The original Constitution drafted by the Founding Fathers, was written in this manner: "The Constitution for the united states of America". The altered version reads: "THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA". It is the corporate constitution. It is NOT the same document you might think it is. The corporate constitution operates in an economic capacity and has been used to fool the People into thinking it is the same parchment that governs the Republic. It absolutely is not.
The question regarding the type of government should now be clear. We are both a Legislative Democracy and Constitutional Republic simultaneously. Essentially, what we want and expect our nation to be is a Republic, but the Federal Government (the Legislative Democracy) has stripped away our sovereignty and basic Human Rights to enable a subtle takeover by foreign banking institutions. This now presents more questions. One of which may be "why?" and another "how?", but the next questions that I will attempt to answer in Part II will be the following (probably,):
- Why does the capitalization matter in the name?
- How does this effect me and my family?
- What is the Birth Certificate, really?
- What is a Person?
- What is a Citizen?
- What does it mean to be sovereign?
Let these questions marinate in your head for a moment; deeply consider the meaning of each (for an exercise of sorts, heh). Stay tuned for Part II, if you're still awake at this point.
Next>
